Reducing cortical inhibition: A conceptual hypothesis of dynamic recovery after perinatal stroke
PDF

Keywords

Cerebral palsy
Stroke
Neural inhibition
Transcranial direct current stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Pyramidal tracts
Motor evoked potentials

Abstract

Introduction: The onset of perinatal stroke often goes unnoticed, and it is only recognized several months or even years later, typically as hemiparetic cerebral palsy. This delay makes it nearly impossible to conduct longitudinal studies from the time of injury, hindering the understanding of the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and limiting the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Contents: This analysis supports the conceptual hypothesis that a reduction in cortical inhibition after perinatal stroke contributes to recovery and further suggests that this reduction may be induced by deafferentation. As muscle activity begins to recover, the degree of deafferentation also changes, leading to a dynamic and sequential modulation of cortical inhibition. This evolving inhibitory state influences the way in which the motor system reorganizes, ultimately shaping the three corticospinal patterns observed in patients with perinatal stroke. Based on this model, transcranial stimulation is discussed as a potential avenue for future research, given its capacity to reduce cortical inhibition.

Conclusion: It is proposed that recovery from perinatal stroke follows a dynamic and sequential process, which is represented by three corticospinal patterns. This conceptual framework opens up new avenues for future research, including the potential for personalized therapeutic strategies involving transcranial stimulation, tailored to each patient’s unique corticospinal organization.

https://doi.org/10.22379/anc.v42i1.627

PDF

References

Kirton A, Metzler MJ, Craig BT, Bonaguro R, Leventer RJ, deVeber GA, et al. Perinatal stroke: mapping and modulating developmental plasticity. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:415–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-021-00503-x

Himmelmann K, Hagberg G, Beckung E, Hagberg B, Uvebrant P. The changing panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. IX. Prevalence and origin in the birth-year period 1995–1998. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94:287–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2005.tb03071.x

Raju TN, Nelson KB, Ferriero D, Lynch JK; NICHD-NINDS Perinatal Stroke Workshop Participants. Ischemic perinatal stroke: summary of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Pediatrics. 2007;120:609–16. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2007-0336

Dunbar M, Kirton A. Perinatal stroke. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2019;32:100767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spen.2019.08.003

Kirton A, Jordan L, de Vries LS. Cerebrovascular disorders in the newborn. In: Swaiman KF, Ashwal S, Ferriero DM, et al., editors. Swaiman's Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 287–308.

Nemanich ST, Lench DH, Sutter EN, Cohen J, Gillick BT, Carmel JB, et al. Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation stratified by corticospinal organization in children with hemiparesis. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2023;43:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2023.01.013

Nitsche MA, Seeber A, Frommann K, Klein CC, Rochford C, Liebetanz D, et al. Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2005;568:291–303. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.092429

Berweck S, Walther M, Brodbeck V, Fietzek UM, Staudt M, Mall V, et al. Abnormal motor cortex excitability in congenital stroke. Pediatr Res. 2008;63:84–8. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31815b88f1

Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Evans AL, Stephens JA. Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Brain. 1993;116:1223–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/116.5.1223

Staudt M, Gerloff C, Grodd W, Holthausen H, Niemann G, Krägeloh-Mann I. Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:854–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20297

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Stroke: Hope through research. NIH Publication No. 20-NS-2222. February 2020. Available from: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/sites/default/files/migrate-documents/stroke_hope_through_research_february_2020_508c.pdf

Ziemann U, Muellbacher W, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain. 2001;124:1171–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.6.1171

Mall V, Berweck S, Fietzek UM, Uhl M, Staudt M, Heinen F, et al. Low level of intracortical inhibition in children shown by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuropediatrics. 2004;35:120–5. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-815834

Pascual-Leone A, Tormos JM, Keenan J, Tarazona F, Cañete C, Catalá MD. Study and modulation of human cortical excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;15:333–43. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005

Donoghue JP, Sanes JN. Organization of adult motor cortex representation patterns following neonatal forelimb nerve injury in rats. J Neurosci. 1988;8:3221–32. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.08-09-03221.1988

Chen R, Corwell B, Yaseen Z, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Mechanisms of cortical reorganization in lower-limb amputees. J Neurosci. 1998;18:3443–50. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-09-03443.1998

Marín-Padilla M. Developmental neuropathology and impact of perinatal brain damage. II: white matter lesions of the neocortex. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1997;56:219–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005072-199703000-00001

Laaksonen K, Kirveskari E, Mäkelä JP, Kaste M, Mustanoja S, Nummenmaa L, et al. Effect of afferent input on motor cortex excitability during stroke recovery. Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;123:2429–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.05.017

Buchkremer-Ratzmann I, Witte OW. Extended brain disinhibition following small photothrombotic lesions in rat frontal cortex. Neuroreport. 1997;8:519–22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199701200-00028

Muellbacher W, Richards C, Ziemann U, Wittenberg GF, Cohen LG, Hallett M, et al. Improving hand function in chronic stroke. Arch Neurol. 2002;59:1278–82. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.59.8.1278

Opsommer E, Zwissig C, Korogod N, Weiss T. Effectiveness of temporary deafferentation of the arm on somatosensory and motor functions following stroke: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016;14:226–57. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003231

Cash RF, Murakami T, Chen R, Thickbroom GW, Ziemann U. Augmenting plasticity induction in human motor cortex by disinhibition stimulation. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26:58–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu176

Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krägeloh-Mann I. Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain. 2002;125:2222–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf227

Swayne O, Rothwell J, Rosenkranz K. Transcallosal sensorimotor integration: effects of sensory input on cortical projections to the contralateral hand. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:855–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.012

Liepert J, Storch P, Fritsch A, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;111:671–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00312-0

Liepert J, Hamzei F, Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1761–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1761::AID-MUS14>3.0.CO;2-M

Manganotti P, Patuzzo S, Cortese F, Palermo A, Smania N, Fiaschi A. Motor disinhibition in affected and unaffected hemisphere in the early period of recovery after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol. 2002;113:936–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00062-7

Young NA, Vuong J, Teskey GC. Development of motor maps in rats and their modulation by experience. J Neurophysiol. 2012;108:1309–17. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01045.2011

Swayne OB, Rothwell JC, Ward NS, Greenwood RJ. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex. 2008;18:1909–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm218

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.