Diagnosis in multiple sclerosis: past and present
PDF (Español)

Keywords

multiple sclerosis
biological markers

Abstract

Because of lack of a gold test, the diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis remains based on the clinical picture and helped by laboratory and magnetic resonance images assesment. There have been several combined criteria aimed to accurate diagnosis. The majority of them shares the dissemination of lesions in time and space and to have no better explanation for the symptoms. It has done an historic summary of the diagnostic criteria since Allison and Millard in 1954 until the last Mc Donald revised criteria, made by international panel in Amsterdam, with the chair of Polman in 2005. According to this, it was agreed that new T2 lesions on MRI at least one month after disease onset or detection of gadolinium enhancement at least 3 months after the onset, if not a site corresponding to the initial event, is enough for demostrating dissemination in time, allowing more rapid diagnosis and providing more flexibility imaging criteria. A spinal cord lesion can be considered equivalent to a brain infratentorial lesion to demostrate dissemination in space. Primary progresive MS can be diagnosed in the abscence of positive CSF findings, in the presence of typical brain MRI lesions. In the future probably the diagnosis would be more exactly with biologic, immunologic or genetic markers, but ever will be better the healthy medical judgment.


PDF (Español)

References

Matheus B. Differential diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and related disorders. En: Compston A. Ebers G, Lassmann H, et al. Editors Mc Alpine´s Multiple Sclerosis 3 erd ed. London: Churchill Livingston , 1998.

Allison R, Millard J. Prevalence and familial incidence of disseminated sclerosis. Ulster Med J 1954; 23 (suppl 2): 1-92.

Schumacher G, Beebe G, Kibler R, Kurland L, Kurtzke J, Mc Dowel F, et al. Problems of experimental trials of therapy in Multiple Sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci 1965; 122: 552-568.

McAlpine, Lumsden C, Acheson E (eds). Multiple Sclerosis: a reppraisal. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1972; 225-226.

Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983; 13: 227-231.

Goodking DE, Dolittle TH, PA-C, Hauser S, Ramsohoff RM, Roses AD, Rudick RA. Diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis research involving multiply affected families. Arch. Neurol 1991; 48: 805-807.

Fasekas F, Offenbacher H, Fuchs S, Schmidt R, Niederkorn K, Horner S, et al. Criteria for an increased specifity of MRI interpretation in elderly subjects with suspected MS. Neuroloy 1998; 38: 1822-1825.

Ruddick R, Cohen J. Multiple Sclerosis or masquerade: accurate diagnosis of early treatment. AAN direct 1999: 8-12.

Barkhof F, Filippi M, Miller D, Scheltens P, Campi A, Polman C, et al. Comparison of MRI criteria at first presentation to predict conversion to clinically definite Multiple Sclerosis. Brain 1997; 120: 2059-2069.

Poser C. An atlas of Multiple Sclerosis. Carnforth UK: Parthenon Publishing, 1998.

Mc Donald WI, Edan G, Goodking D, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, Mc Farland HF, Paty DW, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for Multiple Sclerosis: guidelines from The International Panel on the diagnosis of MS. Ann of Neurol 2001; 50: 121-127.

Tintoré M, Rovira A, Martinez M, et al. Isolated demyelinating syndromes: comparison of different MR imaging criteria to predict conversion to clinically definite MS. Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 702-706.

Paty DW, Oger JJ, Kastrukoff LF, et al. MRI in the diagnosis of MS: a prospective study with comparison of clinical evaluation, evokek potentials, oligoclonal banding and CT. Neurology 1988; 180-185.

Brex FA, Miskiel KA, O´Riordan JI, et al. Assesing the risk of early MS in patients with clinnically isolated syndromes: the rol of follow-up MRI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2001; 70: 390-393.

Polman C, Reingold S, Edan G, et al. Diagnostic criteria fo multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the”McDonald

Criteria” Ann Neurol 2005.

Balteskard L, Rinde E. Medical diagnosis in the internet age. Lancet 1999; 354:14.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.