Tethered cord syndrome in adults
PDF (Español)
HTML (Español)

Keywords

tethered cord síndrome
Nerve conduction study
Somatosensory Evoked potentials
Electromiography
Magnetic resonance Image

Abstract

Introduction. Tethered cord syndrome is due to pathologic fixation of the spinal cord in the spinal canal. It´s an uncommon disease, it´s diagnosis is very late in adults and can simulate other affections. It presents neurological manifestations, orthopedics deformities in legs and skin manifestation. Neurophysiologycal studies are very important in those cases to demonstrate the intensity of nerve affection and exactly topography. The image studies, in special magnetic resonance image confirm this disease.

Objects. Show cases with tethered cord syndrome in uncommon ages, and abnormalities of neurophysiologycal studies in those cases.

Methods. We show three cases with tethered cord syndrome that appears in young ages and others presumptive diagnosis are planted at the beginning of clinical picture. Nerve conduction study, Somatosensory evoked potentials and Electromiography of lower members and Magnetic resonance Images were done to those patients.

Results. Electrophysiologycal studies have showed moderate to severe abnormalities of the nerve structures and Magnetic resonance Images confirmed tethered cord syndrome.

Conclusions. Tethered cord syndrome is uncommon disease in adult but it should be considered in patients that start with progressive orthopedic deformities of lower members. Electrophysiologycal studies are affected. They are very useful to evaluate the neurological structure involvement in it.


PDF (Español)
HTML (Español)

References

Aboal C, Wilson D, Cibils D, Erman A, Penela M. Cirugía de la médula espinal amarrada con monitoreo neurofisiológico intraoperatorio. Rev Med Urug 2006; 22: 152-56.

Aminoff MJ. Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology, 3a ed. New York: Churchill, Livingstone, 1992: 283-327.

Aparicio JM. Espina bífida. Protocolos diagnótico terapéuticos de la AEP. Neurología Pediátrica 2008; 129-34.

Aparicio M. JM. Espina bífida. Protocolo Nº 18, Neurología, Asociación española de Pediatría. [Consultado el 8 de septiembre de 2007]. Disponible en http://www.aeped.es/protocolos/neurologia/18espina.pdf.

Barrero FJ, Salazar S, Ortega MJ, Morales B. Meningitis recurrente como manifestación de un disrafismo espinal en un adulto joven. Rev Neurol, 2002; 35: 825-31.

Bassuk AG, Craig D, Jalali A, Mukhopadhyay A, Kim F, Charrow J et al. The genetics of tethered cord síndrome. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 132: 450-3.

Binnie CD, Cooper R, Fowler CD, Prior PF. Clinical neurophysiology. EMG, nerve conduction and evoked potentials, 1ª ed. London: Hernemann LTD, 1996: 139-56.

Bruce MC. Embriología humana y biología del desarrollo, 3a edición, 2005: 233-275.

D´ Agustini Mo, Firreyra ML, Demarchi DH, Emerich JP, Tornesello B, Pennini MG. Monitoreo neurofisiológico intraoperatorio en la cirugía de la médula anclada. Rev Neurocirugía 2006; vIII(2): 48-51.

Gutiérrez JJ, Pedroza KG, Cuéllar S. Médula anclada en pacientes pediáricos y adolescentes. Revisión de 16 casos. Rev Med Hosp Gen Mex 2007; 70(2): 62-66.

Gutiérrez Rivas E, Jiménez MD, Pardo J, Romer J, editores. Manual de electromiografía clínica. Barcelona: Prus Science; 2000.

Herrero AM, Martínez J, Heredero J, Mera J, Masjuán J. Amiotrofia progresiva de una extremidad como síntoma de presentación del síndrome de médula anclada con lipoma espinal. Rev Neurol 2201; 32: 437-40.

Kaplan KM, Spivak JM, Bendo JA. Embryology of the spine and associated congenital abnormalities. Spine J. 2005; 5(5): 564-76.

Karl FK, Klaus N. Intraoperative monitoring for tethered cord surgery: an Update Neurosurg Focus (series en internet) 2004. [Consultado en abril de 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/470604.

Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscle: Principles and Practice. Philadelphia; 1983.

Ministerio de Salud. Guía clínica. Diagnóstico y tratamiento de disrrafias espinales, 1a edición. Santiago: Minsal; 2005.

Otálora BD, Rostion A. Desarrollo embrionario y defectos del cierre del tubo neural. Rev Pediatría electrónica 2007; 4(3). [Consultado en abril de 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.revistamexicandepediatria.

Phillips LH, Brown WF, Kimura J. Motor nerve conduction. Cleveland: Cleveland Clinical Foundation, 1995: 21-8.

Pilo B, Corral I, Vázquez JM, Rodríguez E. Síndrome de médula anclada en el adulto. Neurología 2006; 21(2): 1-7.

Pinto FC, Fontes RB, Leonhardt MC, Amodio DT, Porrof FF, Machado J. Anatomic study of the filum terminale and its correlations with the tethered cord syndrome release in adults. Surg Neurol 2004; 62: 127-33.

Quiñones A, Gadkary CA, Gulati M, Von Koch CS, Lyon R, Weinstein PR et al. Neurophysiologycal monitoring for safe surgical tethered cord syndrome release in adults. Sur Neurol 2004; 62: 127-33.

Ramírez JM, Alarcón G, Valdevenito G, Cárdenas N, Flandez A. Médula anclada de presentación atípica. A propósito de un caso clínico. Scemess 2005; 1(1): 39-42.

Santos CM. El abecé de la electroneuromiografía clínica. La Habana: Ciencia Médicas; 2000.

Selden NR, Nixon RR, Skoog SR, Lasheley DB. Minimal tethered cord síndrome associated with thickening of the terminal filum. J. Neurosurg Pediatrics 2006; 105: 214-18.

Stalberg E, Falck B. Clinical motor nerve conduction studies. Methods in Clinical Neurophysiology 1993; 4: 61-80.

Yamada S. What is the true tethetered cord síndrome? Childs Nerv Syst 2007; 23: 371-75.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.