Abstract
INTRODUCTION:Tetanus is a disease that affects the nervous system and its clinical presentation is characterized by muscle spasms caused by the release of a neurotoxin produced by the formation of spores of the Clostridium tetani bacteria.
CASE DESCRIPTION:We present the case of a 70-year-old man who after a fall, presented an injury to the ocular region. On admission, signs of local infection and involuntary contraction of the masseter muscles were evident, with impossibility of oral opening. Subsequently, he presented respiratory failure, generalized contractions and transfer to the intensive care unit, due to its similarity to convulsive events, pathology at the level of the central nervous system is suspected, for which it requires complementary studies and clinical analysis to rule it out.
DISCUSSION:The diagnosis of tetanus is clinical, it is important to suspect it in patients with a history of skin lesions and inadequate immunization, due to its extensive clinical presentation, it can lead to confusion with other pathologies. Among the differential diagnoses are epileptic seizures, however, tetanus does not meet the semiological characteristics, does not compromise the state of consciousness and does not progress to status epilepticus, associated with the normality of complementary studies such as neuroimaging, cerebrospinal fluid study and registry electroencephalographic.
CONCLUSION:Tetanus is a highly preventable disease and a diagnostic challenge for the health professional due to its wide onset of symptoms. That is why the diagnostic approach is important to recognize the differential diagnoses based on the clinical history, which allows an early and timely diagnosis.
References
Yen LM y Thwaites CL. Tetanus. Lancet. 2019;393:1657-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33131-3
Rummel A, Bade S, Alves J, Bigalke H, Binz T. Two carbohydrate binding sites in the HCC-domain of tetanus neurotoxin are required for toxicity. J Mol Biol. 2003;326(3):835-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01403-1
Thwaites CL, Yen LM, Glover C, Tuan PQ, Nga NTN, Parry J, et al. Predicting the clinical outcome of tetanus: the tetanus severity score. Trop Med Int Health. 2006;11(3):279-287. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1365-3156.2006.01562.X
Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, et al. Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria with vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018;67(2):1-44. https://doi.org/10.15585/MMWR.RR6702A1
Afshar M, Raju M, Ansell D, Bleck TP Narrative review: Tetanus-a health threat after natural disasters in developing countries. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154(5):329-35. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00007
Kotani Y, Kubo K, Otsu S, Tsujimoto T. Cephalic tetanus as a differential diagnosis of facial nerve palsy. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017:bcr2016216440. https://doi.org/10.1136/BCR-2016-216440
Bernardes M, Presti S, Ratzan K. A case of cephalic tetanus in an elderly patient with trismus. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2018;2018:1247256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1247256
Giannini L, Maccari A, Chiesa V, Canevini MP. Trismus, the first symptom in a challenging diagnosis of tetanus. BMJ Case Rep. 2016;2016:bcr2015213897. https://doi.org/10.1136/BCR-2015-213897
Alessi R, Vincentiis S, Rzezak P, Valente KD. Semiology of psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: Age-related differences. Epilepsy Behav 2013;27(2):292-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YEBEH.2013.02.003
Weinberger B, Schirmer M, Gothe RM, Siebert U, Fuchs D, Grubeck-Loebenstein B. Recall responses to tetanus and diphtheria vaccination are frequently insufficient in elderly persons. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e82967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082967
Rodrigo C, Fernando D, Rajapakse S. Pharmacological management of tetanus: an evidence-based review. Critical Care. 2014;18:217. https://doi.org/10.1186/CC13797
Thwaites C, Yen LM, Loan HT, Thuy TTD, Thwaites GE, Stepniewska K, et al. Magnesium sulphate for treatment of severe tetanus: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London). 2006;368(9545):1436-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69444-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.